Tyrannosaurus Rex Tooth #5

$500.00

Tyrannosaurus Rex Dinosaur Fossils

1 in stock

SKU: Tyrannosaurus Rex Tooth #5 Categories: , Tags: , , ,

Description

  • Tyrannosaurus Rex
  • Cretaceous Age
  • Hello Creek Formation
  • Garfield County, Montana
  • Specimen measures approx. 5/16 long in a STRAIGHT LINE measurement and will come in the  5.25″ x 6.25″ Riker Mount with Labels as Shown. This is a fantastic and RARE little tooth with great serrations and enamel.  If you look at the base of the tooth it is nice and round.. and the tooth has big fat serrations for the size of the tooth.. all that examined it agreed that it was tyrannosaurid and most likely and infant Rex!!

Tyrannosaurus rex (rex meaning “king” in Latin), commonly abbreviated to T. rex, is one of the most well-represented of the large theropods. Tyrannosaurus lived throughout what is now western North America, on what was then an island continent known as Laramidia. Tyrannosaurus had a much wider range than other tyrannosaurids. Fossils are found in a variety of rock formations dating to the Maastrichtian age of the upperCretaceous Period, 68 to 66 million years ago. It was the last known member of the tyrannosaurids, and among the last non-avian dinosaurs to exist before the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event.

Tyrannosaurus rex was one of the largest land carnivores of all time; the largest complete specimen, located at the Field Museum of Natural History under the name FMNH PR2081 and nicknamed Sue, measured 12.3 meters (40 ft) long, and was 4 meters (13 ft) tall at the hips. Mass estimates have varied widely over the years, from more than 7.2 metric tons (7.9 short tons), to less than 4.5 metric tons (5.0 short tons), with most modern estimates ranging between 5.4 metric tons (6.0 short tons) and 6.8 metric tons (7.5 short tons). One study in 2011 found that the maximum weight of Sue, the largestTyrannosaurus, was between 9.5 and 18.5 metric tons (9.3–18.2 long tons; 10.5–20.4 short tons), though the authors stated that their upper and lower estimates were based on models with wide error bars and that they “consider [them] to be too skinny, too fat, or too disproportionate”. Packard et al. (2009) tested dinosaur mass estimation procedures on elephants and concluded that those of dinosaurs are flawed and produce over-estimations; thus, the weight of Tyrannosaurus could have been much less than previously thought. Other estimations have concluded that the largest known Tyrannosaurus specimens had masses approaching or exceeding 9 tonnes.